AI Policy Tracker
Federal and state AI bills and executive actions — each sourced, status-dated, and summarized in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, status, or impact area, or search by keyword.
Where we’re tracking AI legislation
Showing Alabama
- Has published items28 jurisdictions
- Tracked, in review20 jurisdictions
- Nothing tracked yet3 jurisdictions
Shading shows whether the tracker has published items for a jurisdiction — not how much AI activity happens there, and not a rating of the state.
Small jurisdictions
Hard to hit on the map — use these. Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
All jurisdictions A–Z
Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
- Alabama1 published
- Alaska3 in review
- Arizona1 published
- Arkansas
- California6 published
- Colorado2 published
- Connecticut1 published
- Delaware4 in review
- District of Columbia3 in review
- Florida12 in review
- Georgia1 published
- Hawaii2 published
- Idaho1 published
- Illinois1 published
- Indiana4 in review
- Iowa18 in review
- Kansas1 published
- Kentucky1 published
- Louisiana1 published
- Maine1 published
- Maryland2 published
- Massachusetts34 in review
- Michigan8 in review
- Minnesota41 in review
- Mississippi1 published
- Missouri15 in review
- Montana
- Nebraska1 published
- Nevada
- New Hampshire4 in review
- New Jersey2 published
- New Mexico5 in review
- New York1 published
- North Carolina17 in review
- North Dakota1 published
- Ohio13 in review
- Oklahoma17 in review
- Oregon1 published
- Pennsylvania26 in review
- Rhode Island1 published
- South Carolina1 published
- South Dakota3 in review
- Tennessee1 published
- Texas1 published
- Utah1 published
- Vermont13 in review
- Virginia1 published
- Washington2 published
- West Virginia5 in review
- Wisconsin11 in review
- Wyoming1 published
Showing Alabama · 1 match
Clear filtersALEnacted
Health care plans; to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in determinations of coverage
Enacted · status as of 2026-04-17
Alabama SB 63 (effective October 1, 2026) limits how health benefit plan providers may use artificial intelligence in coverage determinations and authorizes the Alabama Department of Insurance to investigate and discipline violations. Where AI is used in utilization review, the act requires that it not rely on a group dataset to make determinations, that it be fairly and equitably applied consistent with applicable U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations and guidance, and that it not discriminate directly or indirectly against any subscriber group or enrollee. A determination to deny, delay, or modify a request for prior authorization based on medical necessity must always be made by a licensed physician or other health care professional competent to evaluate the artificial intelligence's recommendation in light of the enrollee's specific clinical circumstances. Providers must make prominent written disclosure of their use of artificial intelligence in utilization review in their policies and procedures, periodically review that use and its outcomes for accuracy and reliability, and ensure patient data used by artificial intelligence in utilization review is not used beyond its stated purpose, consistent with HIPAA. Compliance is satisfied by an attestation from an authorized representative of the provider based on reasonable reliance on internal policies, procedures, and third-party vendors. Enforcement runs through the Department: where it has reasonable grounds to believe a provider is making prior-authorization determinations adverse to an enrollee without considering the enrollee's medical history and clinical circumstances, it may notify the provider, which must respond within 30 days, and may hold a hearing if the response is unsatisfactory. The act creates no enrollee appeal right.
- Enterprise
- Quality assurance
- AI policy