AI Policy Tracker
Federal and state AI bills and executive actions — each sourced, status-dated, and summarized in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, status, or impact area, or search by keyword.
Where we’re tracking AI legislation
Showing Colorado
- Has published items28 jurisdictions
- Tracked, in review20 jurisdictions
- Nothing tracked yet3 jurisdictions
Shading shows whether the tracker has published items for a jurisdiction — not how much AI activity happens there, and not a rating of the state.
Small jurisdictions
Hard to hit on the map — use these. Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
All jurisdictions A–Z
Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
- Alabama1 published
- Alaska3 in review
- Arizona1 published
- Arkansas
- California6 published
- Colorado2 published
- Connecticut1 published
- Delaware4 in review
- District of Columbia3 in review
- Florida12 in review
- Georgia1 published
- Hawaii2 published
- Idaho1 published
- Illinois1 published
- Indiana4 in review
- Iowa18 in review
- Kansas1 published
- Kentucky1 published
- Louisiana1 published
- Maine1 published
- Maryland2 published
- Massachusetts34 in review
- Michigan8 in review
- Minnesota41 in review
- Mississippi1 published
- Missouri15 in review
- Montana
- Nebraska1 published
- Nevada
- New Hampshire4 in review
- New Jersey2 published
- New Mexico5 in review
- New York1 published
- North Carolina17 in review
- North Dakota1 published
- Ohio13 in review
- Oklahoma17 in review
- Oregon1 published
- Pennsylvania26 in review
- Rhode Island1 published
- South Carolina1 published
- South Dakota3 in review
- Tennessee1 published
- Texas1 published
- Utah1 published
- Vermont13 in review
- Virginia1 published
- Washington2 published
- West Virginia5 in review
- Wisconsin11 in review
- Wyoming1 published
Showing Colorado · 2 matches
Clear filtersCOEnacted
Automated Decision-Making Technology in Consequential Decisions
Enacted · status as of 2026-05-14
Senate Bill 26-189, signed by Governor Polis on May 14, 2026 as Chapter 131, repealed Colorado's 2024 Artificial Intelligence Act and reenacted part 17 of article 1 of title 6 of the Colorado Revised Statutes in its place. Where the 2024 law regulated "high-risk artificial intelligence systems" through a duty of reasonable care against algorithmic discrimination, the replacement regulates "covered automated decision-making technology" — technology that processes personal data to materially influence a consequential decision — and is built on disclosure and consumer rights rather than risk management. A consequential decision is one relating to a consumer's access to, eligibility for, selection for or compensation in a covered domain: education enrollment or opportunity, employment, the lease or purchase of residential real estate in Colorado, financial or lending services, insurance including underwriting, pricing and claims adjudication, health-care services, and essential government services and public benefits including eligibility and renewal determinations. Low-stakes and routine decisions such as scheduling, classroom personalization and administrative routing are excluded. On and after January 1, 2027, a developer must give each deployer a general statement describing the intended and known harmful or inappropriate uses of the technology and a description of the categories of data, including personal data, used to train it. Before a deployer uses covered ADMT to materially influence a consequential decision it must give the consumer clear and conspicuous notice, and when a consumer experiences an adverse outcome the deployer must on request provide instructions for accessing and correcting inaccurate personal data and an opportunity for meaningful human review and reconsideration, to the extent commercially reasonable. The Attorney General enforces the part through the Colorado Consumer Protection Act as a deceptive trade practice, with a sixty-day right to cure that does not apply where a violation is knowing or repeated. The act creates no new private right of action. It took effect on passage under a safety clause and applies to consequential decisions made on or after January 1, 2027.
- Workforce
- Enterprise
- AI policy
COEnacted
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
Enacted · status as of 2026-06-02
House Bill 26-1139 adds two new sections to the Colorado Revised Statutes — 10-16-112.7 (insurance) and 25.5-1-209 (Medicaid and the Children's Basic Health Plan) — to govern the use of artificial intelligence in health care utilization review and to restrict AI-delivered psychotherapy. Insurance carriers, pharmacy benefit managers, utilization review organizations, and behavioral health administrative services organizations that use AI to conduct utilization review must base determinations on the individual patient's own clinical history and circumstances rather than group data alone, avoid discriminatory application, maintain audit logs, and disclose to state regulators how and where AI is used in the review process. Most consequentially, a coverage denial based in whole or in part on medical necessity cannot be issued solely on an AI system's output — a licensed clinician, physician, or other qualified professional must review and approve the denial. Separately, the bill bars health insurance plans, Colorado Medicaid, and the Children's Basic Health Plan from paying for psychotherapy services conducted directly by an AI system, while explicitly permitting nontherapeutic tools — billing software, electronic health records, video platforms — used alongside a human provider. Governor Polis signed the bill June 2, 2026 as Chapter 325, Session Laws of Colorado, with its provisions taking effect January 1, 2027.
- AI policy
- Quality assurance
- Enterprise