AI Policy Tracker
Federal and state AI bills and executive actions — each sourced, status-dated, and summarized in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, status, or impact area, or search by keyword.
Where we’re tracking AI legislation
Showing Oregon
- Has published items28 jurisdictions
- Tracked, in review20 jurisdictions
- Nothing tracked yet3 jurisdictions
Shading shows whether the tracker has published items for a jurisdiction — not how much AI activity happens there, and not a rating of the state.
Small jurisdictions
Hard to hit on the map — use these. Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
All jurisdictions A–Z
Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
- Alabama1 published
- Alaska3 in review
- Arizona1 published
- Arkansas
- California6 published
- Colorado2 published
- Connecticut1 published
- Delaware4 in review
- District of Columbia3 in review
- Florida12 in review
- Georgia1 published
- Hawaii2 published
- Idaho1 published
- Illinois1 published
- Indiana4 in review
- Iowa18 in review
- Kansas1 published
- Kentucky1 published
- Louisiana1 published
- Maine1 published
- Maryland2 published
- Massachusetts34 in review
- Michigan8 in review
- Minnesota41 in review
- Mississippi1 published
- Missouri15 in review
- Montana
- Nebraska1 published
- Nevada
- New Hampshire4 in review
- New Jersey2 published
- New Mexico5 in review
- New York1 published
- North Carolina17 in review
- North Dakota1 published
- Ohio13 in review
- Oklahoma17 in review
- Oregon1 published
- Pennsylvania26 in review
- Rhode Island1 published
- South Carolina1 published
- South Dakota3 in review
- Tennessee1 published
- Texas1 published
- Utah1 published
- Vermont13 in review
- Virginia1 published
- Washington2 published
- West Virginia5 in review
- Wisconsin11 in review
- Wyoming1 published
Showing Oregon · 1 match
Clear filtersOREnacted
Relating to artificial intelligence companions.
Enacted · status as of 2026-04-06
This bill regulates operators of AI companion software and platforms. It requires operators to notify users when they are interacting with artificial output rather than a human, specifically when a reasonable person might otherwise believe they are speaking with a natural person. Operators must implement a protocol to detect and prevent output that could cause suicidal ideation, suicidal intent, self-harm ideation, or self-harm intent. The protocol must include referral to an appropriate crisis lifeline and additional intervention based on clinical best practices. When an operator has reason to believe a user is a minor, additional disclosures and statements are required, and the operator must take reasonable steps to prevent the AI companion from generating statements that would make the minor believe they are interacting with a natural person. Operators must publish an annual public report disclosing incidents in which users were referred to resources related to suicide or self-harm prevention. Users who suffer ascertainable harm may bring a civil action for damages and injunctive relief.
- AI policy
- Enterprise
- Quality assurance