AI Policy Tracker
Federal and state AI bills and executive actions — each sourced, status-dated, and summarized in plain English. Filter by jurisdiction, status, or impact area, or search by keyword.
Where we’re tracking AI legislation
Showing New York
- Has published items28 jurisdictions
- Tracked, in review20 jurisdictions
- Nothing tracked yet3 jurisdictions
Shading shows whether the tracker has published items for a jurisdiction — not how much AI activity happens there, and not a rating of the state.
Small jurisdictions
Hard to hit on the map — use these. Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
All jurisdictions A–Z
Jurisdictions with no note have no AI bills in the tracker yet.
- Alabama1 published
- Alaska3 in review
- Arizona1 published
- Arkansas
- California6 published
- Colorado2 published
- Connecticut1 published
- Delaware4 in review
- District of Columbia3 in review
- Florida12 in review
- Georgia1 published
- Hawaii2 published
- Idaho1 published
- Illinois1 published
- Indiana4 in review
- Iowa18 in review
- Kansas1 published
- Kentucky1 published
- Louisiana1 published
- Maine1 published
- Maryland2 published
- Massachusetts34 in review
- Michigan8 in review
- Minnesota41 in review
- Mississippi1 published
- Missouri15 in review
- Montana
- Nebraska1 published
- Nevada
- New Hampshire4 in review
- New Jersey2 published
- New Mexico5 in review
- New York1 published
- North Carolina17 in review
- North Dakota1 published
- Ohio13 in review
- Oklahoma17 in review
- Oregon1 published
- Pennsylvania26 in review
- Rhode Island1 published
- South Carolina1 published
- South Dakota3 in review
- Tennessee1 published
- Texas1 published
- Utah1 published
- Vermont13 in review
- Virginia1 published
- Washington2 published
- West Virginia5 in review
- Wisconsin11 in review
- Wyoming1 published
Showing New York · 1 match
Clear filtersNYEnacted
Relates to the training and use of artificial intelligence frontier models; defines terms; establishes remedies for violations.
Enacted · status as of 2025-12-19
The New York RAISE Act (S. 6953-B) amends the General Business Law by adding Article 44-B to regulate the training and deployment of high-powered AI systems called 'frontier models.' A 'frontier model' is defined in Section 1420 as an AI model trained using more than 10^26 computational operations with a compute cost exceeding $100 million, or a distilled model derived from such a system costing more than $5 million. A 'large developer' is any person who has trained at least one frontier model and spent over $100 million in aggregate compute costs, excluding accredited colleges and universities engaged in academic research. Under Section 1421, before deploying a frontier model, large developers must: implement a written safety and security protocol; retain unredacted copies of that protocol for the duration of deployment plus five years; publish a redacted version and transmit it to the Attorney General and the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services; record and retain test results in sufficient detail for third-party replication; and implement safeguards against unreasonable risk of 'critical harm.' Large developers are prohibited from deploying a frontier model if doing so would create an unreasonable risk of critical harm—defined in Section 1420 as causing death or serious injury to 100 or more people or at least $1 billion in damages through CBRN weapons or autonomous AI criminal conduct. Annual protocol reviews are required, and safety incidents must be disclosed to state authorities within 72 hours of discovery. Section 1422 authorizes the Attorney General to bring civil actions with penalties up to $10 million for a first violation and $30 million for subsequent violations, but establishes no private right of action. Section 1424 limits the law's scope to frontier models developed, deployed, or operating in whole or in part in New York. The act takes effect 90 days after enactment.
- Enterprise
- Quality assurance
- Certifications
- AI policy